Investigating the Attitudes of Chemistry Students Towards Blended Learning: A Survey Cross Sectional







Vol. 9 No. 4 (2023): April


Blended learning, Chemistry students, Covid-19, Indonesia learning policy

Research Articles


How to Cite

Huda, N., Rohaeti, E., & Ikhsan, J. . (2023). Investigating the Attitudes of Chemistry Students Towards Blended Learning: A Survey Cross Sectional. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1621–1631.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


This study's main objective is to explore chemistry students' attitudes towards the learning policies implemented during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Method: This study used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey method. Respondents were 201 students majoring in chemistry at a university in Surabaya, Indonesia. The data collection instrument was a questionnaire developed during the research and validated through a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) test. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics and two-way ANOVA test to interpret differences in student perspectives based on two characteristics. Findings: 18 of the 21 questionnaire items fall into the valid and reliable category with a loading factor value greater than 0.50. From the two characteristics of the respondents who were analyzed through the two-way ANOVA test, there were significant differences in student perspectives on the implementation of learning based on learning intensity with significance levels of 0.031. Overall, 52% of students choose blended learning, 46% face-to-face, and 2% online learning. Implications for Research and Practice: Currently, blended learning is still relevant for chemistry students in Indonesia. With notes, face-to-face learning is carried out more than virtual (online) learning, and practical learning in the laboratory is carried out face-to-face in full.


Ali, W. (2020). Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16.

Alzahrani, M. (2022). Traditional Learning Compared to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From Faculty’s Perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2), 215824402210917.

Anwar, M., Zaman Khan, S., & Ali Shah, S. Z. (2020). A Study of the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance Among NPOs in Pakistan. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(1), 26–40.

Aristovnik, A., KeržiÄ, D., RavÅ¡elj, D., TomaževiÄ, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438.

Asih, N. M., Jaman, J. H., & Umaidah, Y. (2022). Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Bantuan Kuota Internet Dari Kemendikbud Dimasa Covid-19 Menggunakan Algoritma C5. 0. INTECOMS: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 5(2), 1-9.

Astutik, E., Sebayang, S. K., Puspikawati, S. I., Tama, T. D., Sintha, D. M., & Dewi, K. (2020). Depression, Anxiety, and Stress among Students in Newly Established Remote University Campus in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 16(1), 270-277. Retrieved from

Atwa, H., Shehata, M. H., Al-Ansari, A., Kumar, A., Jaradat, A., Ahmed, J., & Deifalla, A. (2022). Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students’ Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 791352.

Azwar, S. (2021). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338.

Bolatov, A. K., Seisembekov, T. Z., Smailova, D. S., & Hosseini, H. (2022). Burnout syndrome among medical students in Kazakhstan. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 193.

Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: An academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 41–60.

Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the Importance of Laboratory Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193–195.

Brown, M., Skerritt, C., Shevlin, P., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2022). Deconstructing the challenges and opportunities for blended learning in the post emergency learning era. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 71–84.

Chan, P., Van Gerven, T., Dubois, J.-L., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100053.

Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(4), 729–732.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7. Retrieved from

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Christ Dass, L. (2020). Online Learning Readiness Among University Students in Malaysia Amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson.

de Lima, D. P. R., Gerosa, M. A., Conte, T. U., & de M. Netto, J. F. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: The instructors’ perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1), 22.

Djalante, R., Lassa, J., Setiamarga, D., Sudjatma, A., Indrawan, M., Haryanto, B., Mahfud, C., Sinapoy, M. S., Djalante, S., Rafliana, I., Gunawan, L. A., Surtiari, G. A. K., & Warsilah, H. (2020). Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020. Progress in Disaster Science, 6, 100091.

Fadhilah, A. R., Fitri, R. R., & Wibowo, Y. S. (2021). Distance education di masa covid-19: Tinjauan terhadap sistem, kebijakan, dan tantangan e-education di sekolah. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 18.

Ferdig, R. E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Mouza, C. (2020). Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field. AACE-Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Flynn, N., Keane, E., Davitt, E., McCauley, V., Heinz, M., & Mac Ruairc, G. (2021). ‘Schooling at Home’ in Ireland during COVID-19’: Parents’ and Students’ Perspectives on Overall Impact, Continuity of Interest, and Impact on Learning. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 217–226.

Giray, L., Gumalin, D., Jacob, J., & Villacorta, K. (2022). Exploring the Online Learning Experience of Filipino College Students During Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(1), 227.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition. Pearson.

Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in Online Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

Ibrahim, F., Padilla-Valdez, N., & Rosli, U. K. (2022). Hub-and-spokes practices of blended learning: Trajectories of emergency remote teaching in Brunei Darussalam. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 525–549.

Jumani, N. B., Malik, S., & Akram, H. (2018). Challenges and Successes of Blended Learning in Directorate of Distance Education, IIIUI. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from

Kang, M., & Duong, A. (2021). Student Perceptions of First-Time Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam. ie: inquiry in education, 13(1), 8. Retrieved from

Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Approach. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Kim, H.-Y. (2014). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)-exploring possible interaction between factors. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 39(2), 143.

Kolil, V. K., Muthupalani, S., & Achuthan, K. (2020). Virtual experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 30.

Le, B., Lawrie, G. A., & Wang, J. T. H. (2022). Student Self-perception on Digital Literacy in STEM Blended Learning Environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 303–321.

Macias, D., Stips, A., & Hanke, G. (2022). Model based estimate of transboundary litter pollution on Mediterranean coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 175, 113121.

Masturin, M., & Zaman, W. K. (2022). Blended Learning as Solution in Character Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. QUALITY, 10(1), 121.

Mitarlis, M., Nasrudin, H., Rusmini, R., & Novita, D. (2021). Utilization of Surrounding Materials to Support Basic Chemistry Learning in the Covid19 Pandemic Era. In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021) (pp. 254-260). Atlantis Press.

Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era: Online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4).

Munoz-Najar, A., Gilberto, A., Hasan, A., Cobo, C., Azevedo, J. P., & Akmal, M. (2021). Remote Learning During COVID-19: Lessons from Today, Principles for Tomorrow. World Bank.

Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Measuring Social Value Orientation. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101.

Nasution, A. K. P., Surbakti, A. H., Zakaria, R., Wahyuningsih, S. K., & Daulay, L. A. (2021). Face to Face Learning vs Blended Learning vs Online Learning (Student Perception of Learning). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 012112.

Omar, H. A., Ali, E. M., & Belbase, S. (2021). Graduate Students’ Experience and Academic Achievements with Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13055.

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46.

Purnama, S., Ulfah, M., Machali, I., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2021). Does digital literacy influence students’ online risk? Evidence from Covid-19. Heliyon, 7(6), e07406.

Ramadani, R., Hamzah, Y. A., & Mangerengi, A. A. (2021). Indonesia’s Legal Policy During COVID-19 Pandemic: Between the Right to Education and Public Health. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(1), 125–156.

Ray, S., & Srivastava, S. (2020). Virtualization of science education: A lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Proteins and Proteomics, 11(2), 77–80.

Sekhon, Ms. S. K., & Patil, S. (2021). "Student Engagement in Traditional Learning vs Online Learning—A comparative study. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology/, 18(7), 2134–2147. Retrieved from

Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171.

Soon Tan, C., Zakuan, N., & Ismail Abd Aziz, M. (2022). Recent Trends of Blended Learning and Flipped Classroom in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 2, 290–301.

Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967.

Tan, C. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student motivation, community of inquiry and learning performance. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 308–321.

Vargo, D., Zhu, L., Benwell, B., & Yan, Z. (2021). Digital technology use during COVID â€19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 13–24.

Watrianthos, R., Hasibuan, R., Rimbano, D., Jalinus, N., & Abdullah, R. (2021). Effectiveness Blended Learning During Pandemic in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 22(2), 270–278.

Westphal, A., Kalinowski, E., Hoferichter, C. J., & Vock, M. (2022). K−12 teachers’ stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920326.

Wijenayaka, L. A., & Iqbal, S. S. (2021). Going virtual with practical chemistry amidst the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: Significance, constraints and implications for future. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(3), 255–270.

Xie, H., Liu, W., Bhairma, J., & shim, E. (2018). Analysis of Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Learning Environments. Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Joint International Information Technology,Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018). Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Joint International Information Technology,Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018), Chongqing, China.

Yan, L., Whitelockâ€Wainwright, A., Guan, Q., Wen, G., GaÅ¡ević, D., & Chen, G. (2021). Students’ experience of online learning during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic: A provinceâ€wide survey study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 2038–2057.

Yılmaz, Ö., & Malone, K. L. (2020). Preservice teachers perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 18.

Yustina, Y., Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking Skills through Online Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408–420.

Author Biographies

Nur Huda, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Eli Rohaeti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Jaslin Ikhsan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta


Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Huda, Eli Rohaeti, Jaslin Ikhsan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).